Love is the Fulfilling of the Law
ON GOD; Part LXXI
I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
John 10:10
The saying above served as our introduction into what we can consider one of the many ‘Easter’ type scenarios that we find in the gospels and in the words of Jesus and one into which we were able to incorporate some of the ideas from our current theme of illusion, glamour and deception. Jesus’ death is real as is His resurrection from the dead and it is in these two scripted events that there lies the Master’s teaching to us all regrading the reality of Life. He tells us of His own physical Life in the world “Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down , and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father” (John 10:17-18) and we need to see this as the indicator of what we are to do as men in form in regard to our own physical Life. Like so many others of His sayings that come to us couched in mystery and in the form of parables, this one has a double meaning. For Him it is one that is indicative of His Earthly Life as a man who had long since overcome the wiles of the world and the lures of Life in form and which was necessarily the real death of the physical body and its resurrection. For us it is one that by the example of His Life of Love and His desire to lay it down to show the way, we must see as our own the ability to forsake the wiles of the world and the lures of Life in form and to let the self-serving personality die so that the ALL-serving Soul, the Christ Within, can be resurrected within the body. As we have seen in recent posts this is, in its totality, the act of becoming a True disciple of the Master and being accounted worthy of His Kingdom.
For us then this is the True meaning of the Resurrection of the Christ and we should remember here that He did not do this act of “I lay down my life, that I might take it again” nearly as clearly as we are led to believe by the doctrines of the Church. We have covered this idea before in our posts (In the Words of Jesus parts 59 and 193) and in the observations by those who were there and those who wrote about them shortly thereafter is much insight into the mysterious and the parabolic nature of the events. Our point is that the Master did not die on the Cross as Jesus and take up His life again in the same way but rather He continued to show us the relative unimportance of the form that we use and we take this idea from the biblical accounts.
First we should remember that He appeared to them in different forms: From the Gospel of Mark we have these words in that section of his gospel that is disputed “After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country” (Mark 16:12) This does however bear similarity to those sayings in the Gospel of Luke which create quite a story for two disciples who were with Him and likely knew Him well:
- “Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them. And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre. And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus. And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments: And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead? He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee, Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. And they remembered his words, And returned from the sepulchre, and told all these things unto the eleven, and to all the rest. It was Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles. And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not. Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down , he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass. And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs. And they talked together of all these things which had happened. And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them. But their eyes were holden that they should not know him. And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad? And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days? And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people: And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done. Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre; And when they found not his body, they came, saying , that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive. And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not. Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself. And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further. But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them. And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures? And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them, Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon. And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread. And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit. And he said unto them, Why are yet roubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have yehere any meat? And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. And he took it, and did eat before them. And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.” (Luke 24:1-44).
- In the first lengthy story above we find that the women visit the tomb and find the stone rolled away yet they do not understand that this is as the Master had said it would be until after they are reminded by the ‘angels‘. Now the women go and tell the apostles and they, who should know and understand, do not believe what they are told. Peter then goes to the tomb and seeing it empty still does not understand that this is as the Master had said; in fact, it is Peter who rebukes the Master for His saying : “that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. And he spake that saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him” (Mark 8:31-32). It is Peter who should know best of all.
- Then we have two of the ‘other disciples’ that were not of the twelve but likely among the seventy and we have no reason to assume that these did not know the Master well. These two are walking and are joined by a man who they do not recognize and who questions them about their conversation. They admit to their relationship with the Master and tell of how they believed that He was the Messiah and how that they knew that it was the third day and that the women had been to the tomb and it was empty. Here again it does not dawn on these disciples that things are happening as the Master told them that they would and this is aside from the fact that they are in His presence and know it not. The Master says them “O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself” and they still do not recognize what has happened nor what is happening.
- It is only when the Master stays with them and after “he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them” that they understand that this is He and then “he vanished out of their sight“. Are we getting a better feel for what is happening? how these disciples can spend the time with the Master walking and talking and not know Him and then He simply vanishes. Can we see how it can be so that His appearance is not that of Jesus and in His vanishing can we see how He can be or not be in any form of a man at will?
- These disciples then go and find the eleven and hear from them that Peter has seen the Lord and then relate their story and how the Master was only “known of them in breaking of bread“. There are two references here to the “breaking of bread” and if we can break ourselves away from the paintings of the Last Supper we could likely understand that there may have more present than the twelve and hence more that know of the significance. It is a “large upper room” (Mark 14:15, Luke 22:12) and perhaps the reference to the twelve is only those at the table of the Master. It really does not matter except that we can see from the dialogue in Luke’s Gospel that they do understand the significance of the “breaking of bread“.
- Rather immediately after this conversation between the two disciple and the eleven “Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you“. Now here we have a sudden appearance of the Master in the midst of the group and it results in their fear and terror and this is after Peter has seen the Master and the two disciples as well. As yet they do not understand the Power of the Christ to be as He will and when He will and it is interesting that even after His calming talk to them and His showing them of His hands and His feet that still “they yet believed not for joy, and wondered“. He then reminds them once again of the “words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.”
- We next have the experience of Mary Magdalene as told in the Gospel of John where she believes that the Master is the Gardener. Again we have one who knows the Master well and one who would not likely be fooled easily but who does not realize that she is in His presence until after He says some familiar thing to her. Except He looked like someone else, there is no valid reason for her to not know Him despite what the commentators and doctrine tell us. The scripture does not tell us that after He speaks to her saying her name that she then recognized Him where before she did not, it only implies for us that she then knew that it was He.
- In the last instance that we quote above we find a different type of thing happening. Several of the disciples are fishing and they see a man on the shore who calls out to them and who, reminiscent to the time that some of them first met the Master, then tells them to cast their net and they catch many fish. After this John intuitively knows that this is the Master and tells Peter who “cast himself into the sea“. Up to now the only idea that this is the Master comes from John and presumably he understands this because of the “multitude of fishes“. They all come to shore and they bring the fish and join with the Master to dine and it is here that we see John’s comment that “none of the disciples durst ask him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord“. Does not this beg to tell us that the Master did not appear to be who they had come to know in the appearance of Jesus but rather looked differently causing John’s saying?
Is it not logical that as a part of the teaching to the disciples, and through them to us, that this idea of the relative unimportance of the physical appearance should be a part? and that it should be a part that is given to us in a cloud of mystery and parable as is all else that pertains to the Kingdom of God? The Lord is resurrected and He is among them, teaching them, and we can see that at a minimum that there should be some doubt as to His resurrected appearance. It is only in the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead and in the doctrine that this body that we have here and now is the only appearance that we will have in Earth and in Heaven that there is insistence that the idea that the resurrection is of the same body of the Master the died on Good Friday sans the welts and the bruises inflicted as He was scourged at the hand of Pilate and that this is the body of His resurrection.
Note on the Quote of the Day
This daily blog also has a Quote of the Day which may not be in any way related to the essay. Many of these will be from the Bible and some just prayers or meditations that may have an influence on you and are in line with the subject matter of this blog. As the quote will change daily and will not store with the post, it is repeated in this section with the book reference and comment.
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be. As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. A sober person is not bewildered by such a change. (Bhagavad Gita 2:12-13) from Bhagavad Gita as it is.
Today’s Quote of the Day is from the ancient Hindu text of the Bhagavad Gita. This quote is the essence of reincarnation which has been modified by the religious beliefs of some Hindu sects to deviate from the essential truth. For us it is a guide to the proper understanding of Life itself and it is in so many ways intimately tied to the properly understood teachings of the Master that we try to expound in our post.
- 8 Bible commentaries on BibleStudyTools.com